Quick Abstract: This was the first peer-reviewed research publication on Process Feedback. It introduces the central idea of the tool, how it directly helps students develop metacognition, and how it respects their privacy.

Quick Abstract: With around 200 student participants, this paper discusses an interesting finding: AI feedback features were found to be most useful for students learning to code compared to those who already have some coding experience. It also finds that female students find the AI feedback feature more helpful.

Quick Abstract: This paper surveys several teachers and students who used Process Feedback in their classes. It finds that when tools like Process Feedback are introduced in a way that students perceive as potentially beneficial to their learning, they are more open to using them in their work.

Quick Abstract: This research study, involving sixty-five tenth-grade Dutch students, found that implementing the process feedback approach for just one week led to an improvement in writing quality that would typically take a year to achieve. This paper was a key inspiration for the Process Feedback project.

Quick Abstract: This paper explores how process-based analytics can shift the focus from final writing products to the actual effort and engagement demonstrated by students during the drafting process. It argues that by making this 'hidden' labor visible, educators can better support student development and move beyond the limitations of traditional outcome-based assessment.